Foolish Samurais: A review of “No Need For Bushido”
In this world where we are beset on all sides by the Shaolin shadowboxing and the Wu-Tang sword style, is there No Need For Bushido? I climbed up to the Thirty-Sixth Chamber to consult with my Master. He greeted me warmly and poured me a cup of green tea. “Your heart seems troubled,” he said calmly, his voice like the gentle wind caressing the leaves in summer.
“I am torn,” I said. “On the one hand, my soul tells me to hate this comic. The female character named Ina fills Three out of the Six Webcomic Cliches as defined by Master Croshaw: Female Characters Are Hot, Female Characters Are Violent, and Female Characters are ‘Straight.’ Not unlike her other sisters in Hammerspace (such as Akane Tendo and Naru Narusegawa), her constant mood swings began to wear on my soul. The other characters are also cliches: the clueless yet startlingly adept samurai; the not-quite-stoic blind Taoist priest; and the brooding guy with the big sword. If I tried hard enough, I should be able to find their exact duplicates in Inu-Yasha or Rurouni Kenshin.
“Then there is the humor. It is cornier than a KFC Famous Bowl. The jokes about being in Canada or the samurai mistaking everyone for a girl cause my eyes to roll in exasperation. And ‘Holy Shnkikies’? That pale attempt at a catchphrase incites within me nothing less than a boiling rage directed at the True North. This is humor I may have found funny in Grade 3 when Knock-Knock jokes were good for a laugh. However, judging from the copious bloodshed and slight instances of nudity, I gather the under 10 set are not Alex Kolesar and Joseph Kovell’s primary target audience.”
The Master cupped a small dash of sesame seeds in his palm. “Yet,” he said, “for every ying, there is a yang. You admit that the comic does have its moments. Tell me, my son, what do you like about No Need for Bushido?”
“Well,” I said, “I actually thought the relationship between Ina and Yori was pretty sweet. What can I say? I’m a big softie at heart. There is nothing quite like the relationship between the dorky samurai and his lady love. Despite being walking cliches, I actually found myself liking the characters quite a bit … which is probably why writers stick to these cliches in the first place. The guy with the big sword, Ken, may be my favorite, just for being an unrepentant jerk with a love for theater. I guess he reminds me of myself sometimes.
“Plus the comic does a good job if mixing comedy elements with serious elements. I found some of the more dramatically inclined moments difficult to read and grasp, what with the warring clans and the vows of vengeance. At the beginning, there’s walls of text explaining it all. Eventually, though, the art gets polished to the point it can carry the brunt of the story, and the dialogue gets easier to follow. I also appreciate that the different elements were present from the beginning. It felt natural when Bushido transitioned from comedy to drama to action sequences.”
“I see,” said the Master, as birds lighted onto his palm to feed. “I sense there is something else you are not telling me.”
“This review might not be totally fair,” I said. “For you see, No Need for Bushido is about 350 pages long. We were asked to review it over the busy Fourth of July weekend, which for the most part I spent under the stars and very far away from city lights. I read the first 150 pages straight, then skipped around until about the last 70 pages. The rest I tried to fill in from Wikipedia. Curiously, the ‘Plot Details’ section also omits the parts I hadn’t read. The art evolves drastically in six years. It changes from being a crudely drawn cartoony images to a highly polished imitation of anime. Both styles do have their strengths: the early stuff better serves the comedy, while the late period feels more suitable for kinetic action sequences. Since No Need For Bushido dabbles in both, either style feels appropriate in their own way, though the recent style is far easier on the eyes. Don’t you think so, Master?”
“How should I know?” the Master said. “You just made me up for this ridiculously gimmicky review.”
“Oh,” I said, enlightened. “Well, despite not having read every single page of the comic, I feel confident splitting the difference with Bushido Muyo.”
“Hmm?”
“Um, I mean No Need for Bushido.”
Rating: 




No Need for Bushido
by Alex Kolesar and Joseph Kovell
http://www.noneedforbushido.com/
review by Larry “El Santo” Cruz
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL



July 11th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
I may have worked in Bob Hope and Dorothy Lamour, but you turned your review into a narrative epic. I am not worthy ….
July 11th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
Indeed! I suspect he no longer will say I, alone, have narrative epics worthy of framing. We see his true colors at last!
July 11th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Thanks. It was a concept that latched onto my brain when I read the name of the title, and it wouldn’t let go. To be honest, though, I was starting to think someone else here would try the same gimmick, and we’d get the lame “two reviewers pretending they’re samurai” scenario.
July 11th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
So, Doctor, has the Grasshopper earned the right to leave the Monastery?
July 11th, 2008 at 11:42 pm
Don’t fall for El Santo’s parlor tricks, guys. Don’t you wonder where he found a Master in “the 36th chamber?”
Remember his first review here…Geeks Next Door. I quote:
“El Santo is coming with his Shaolin shadowboxing and his Wu-Tang sword style to engage in a little comic fencing brouhaha.” This was an inside job.
More seriously, the review had a very spontaneous feel. Nice touch.
July 12th, 2008 at 7:23 am
I believe his time has come, yes.
..although that can also be taken in a menacing fashion - this stuff is so HARD to say!
July 15th, 2008 at 5:32 pm
Huh, this sounds suspiciously like something I might have written. Now I’ll have to dig into this thing’s archives at some point because of you.
July 16th, 2008 at 12:18 am
Believe it or not, Haus, I was a bit hesitant about posting this because I thought this review might come off as a rip-off of your style. I think one of your reviews may have burrowed into my subconscious and surfaced at this moment.
Don’t worry: I think this is the one and only time I’ll enter Story mode.
July 16th, 2008 at 8:48 am
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, after all.
Some of his reviews have been similar in style to mine as well - or at least they seemed so to me - and I took it as a compliment!
July 16th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Actually, I’ve always confused “The Doctor” with “Dr. Haus” on several occasions.
Whatsupwitdat?!?!
July 16th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Saddly the art is one of the few really good points about the comic, everything else is just either so blantantly cliche or just thrown in to be “cool\wacky” (like Lex and Matrix and the impossibly huge sword). While sticking to the cliches might have a slight advantage, it also makes the comic predictable (how many times can Ina’s father fail another kidnapping due to being distracted by the sexy girl ninjas) and makes it feel like the writer isn’t even trying.
July 17th, 2008 at 9:32 am
I don’t know about the confusion, Santo, but I can assure you that while Dr Haus may be A doctor, I am THE Doctor…the genuine article, you might say.
Separate entity entirely.
My imitation comment was supportive of you - sometimes your reviews have looked like mine, and I took it as a compliment. Hopefully Dr. Haus will, too, rather than thinking you nicked his style, so to speak.
July 17th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
I’d like to think that my style is very distinct from Dr. Haus’ mainly because:
1.) I include overt references to the Wu-Tang Clan, and
2.) At least 50% of my reviews are intelligible.
(I kid, Dr. Haus! Please don’t illicitly harvest my kidneys. Besides, I always felt you sorta reveled in the esoterica.)
And, wow, it’s Yaoi Huntress Earth! A past visitor for my blog shows up here! How’s it hangin’, YHE?