Calamities of nature
Ok, I’ll say it straight up front, so there are no misunderstandings -
I didn’t “get” this comic. What’s more, for my own reasons, I didn’t particularly like it, either.
I read it, and in some cases I re-read it, and can honestly say I didn’t crack a smile or find things that really made me laugh. Was it because the comic was horrible and I was constantly cringing? Not at all. On the contrary, the art was good (although to be fair it looked like a meeting between Walt Kelly’s Pogo and some of the cast from Bloom County - that kept throwing me off), and I didn’t see anything that would make me caution children or the overly-sensitive to not read it.
Still - I didn’t laugh. There’s usually three reasons for that not happening; (1) The humor is either terrible or sophomoric or (2) It’s extremely metaphorical or “in the know” kind of humor, or it’s (3) the same old, tired, “trying to be with it and socially relevant” humor that we’re buried in every day. I think, in this instance, it’s numbers 2 and 3. I’m not really an “in the know” kind of person when it comes to the current trends, etc., when you get right down to it. I also don’t like most of today’s political/sociological humor, namely because it’s overdone, overused, and at this point has become mostly trite, in my opinion. (Perfect example - the comic used with this post. Like we haven’t seen the “evil cops abusing black people” jokes about a thousand times? What’s the point? Or perhaps comic # 67 from April 21, 2008 - tried and true “loud, obese woman with cart full of high fat products” - one of them says “Pig” - that’s subtle, right? Let’s see, “Obesity in America” comic? Come on. Imagination, anyone?) The current line of strips is, apparently, making fun the foibles of being a “connoisseur” by having one of the characters become a “soda connoisseur.” Ok, perhaps a little funny, but after 3 and more strips, kind of drawn out.
Maybe I’m old fashioned, but does anyone else remember comics - even ones that spoke on social issues - using that little known trait of “subtlety” instead of the now used traits of “I’ll slam this RIGHT IN YOUR FACE so you can’t possibly miss my meaning,” coupled with “I’ll copy the same jokes/gags that most other comics of my ilk do, but I’ll change a word or two”? What kind of commentary must that be on the perceived education level of the readers?
Overall, not a bad comic, I guess - just kind of predictable and, for that reason dull, to me; definitely not one I’d re-read. If you’re a fan of that kind of humor, though, then I say in fairness, give it a read and make your own call.
Calamities of Nature, by Tony Piro
www.calamitiesofnature.com
Rating: 




RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL



(2 votes, average: 3.5 out of 5)
September 26th, 2008 at 8:57 am
Just as a side note, did anyone figure out why it’s called “Calamities of Nature,” or is that one of those “in the know” kind of things?
Some l33t joke, I believe you’d say?
September 26th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
Great similarity contrast comparing Calamities art style, you represented to the reader of the review the reasons “why you didnt get it”, or “why you got it but you’ve seen that particular situation before”.
You’ve got some good angles in the first two paragraphs then the whole concept of your dislike disappears with an inane rant, if you were to just leave that at the door with other preconceived notions I would take what you say as something to consider.
This review is worth a read., but dont read much more into it. With all reviews of any type you need to read something and judge for yourself.
- Phil (Frumph)
September 26th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Hmmm….your last comment sounds suspiciously like “…read it and make your own call,” doesn’t it? I wonder where that was said before?
Amazing that so long as people say good things about the comic you’re happy and complimentary. (See the comment on Delos’ review) As soon as they express opinions that aren’t good or something they didn’t like in the comic, you become insulting and begin putting them down. That’s just a LITTLE narrow minded, isn’t it? Particularly when the whole point of the review is to express an opinion?
So as he said, I agree - don’t read much into his comments - apparently he’s either a forum troll or a rabid fanboy and so will slam anyone who dares disagree with the idea that this comic is the epitome of the art form.
September 27th, 2008 at 12:18 am
Man! I was going to make the Pogo comparison as well as the Bloom County and then didn’t. How awesomely serendipitous would that have been?
September 27th, 2008 at 6:38 am
We would have given the fanboys heartburn forever, I’m afraid
September 28th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
I’m glad your scathing reviews are back. Stop adding disclaimers though, we all know it’s your opinion and you know you’re going to piss people off regardless. Embrace it.
September 28th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Thanks! I enjoy them myself, actually. (Definitely not scathing, though - I’ve done scathing and that wasn’t even close)
And if people want to waste time getting all upset because I or someone else didn’t like the comic, then that’s their time to waste - more power to them, I say!